Saturday, October 23, 2021

Merck comes up short in last-ditch effort to revive $2.54B patent verdict against Gilead

After years of legal back-and-forth over a massive hepatitis C patent verdict, Merck’s efforts to revive the award have come up short. The Supreme Court refused to take up Merck’s case, meaning a lower court’s decision favoring Gilead will stand—and the $2.54 billion verdict is officially kaput.

In its Tuesday update, the Supreme Court said it would not take up the lawsuit between Merck subsidiary Idenix Pharmaceuticals and Gilead Sciences. Merck had won the $2.54 billion patent verdict in 2016 when a jury found Gilead had infringed on a Merck patent. The jury ordered Gilead to shell out those billions because of its high sales for hep C meds Harvoni and Sovaldi. 

Representatives for Merck and Gilead didn’t immediately respond to requests for comment. 

Launch Readiness

Optimize cross-functional collaboration and engage with key stakeholders for the successful launch of a product

Join the Launch Readiness for Medical Affairs & Communications Teams Summit to learn best practices in taking a structured approach to enhance medical affairs activities surrounding a launch and increase knowledge and communication with thought leaders.

RELATED: Merck fails to resurrect its $2.5B hep C patent win as appeals court rules for Gilead 

During the years that followed, the companies battled over the massive award. In 2018, a federal judge found Merck’s ‘597 patent invalid and overturned the verdict. At the time, a Merck representative said the company didn’t believe the ruling reflected the “facts of the case.” Merck pledged to appeal. 

That appeal effort hit a setback the following year, 2019, when the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit upheld the lower court’s ruling. Now, with the SCOTUS decision, Gilead will walk away from the litigation without having to pay the verdict. 

RELATED: Gilead wins reversal of $2.54B hepatitis C patent verdict, but Merck says fight not over yet 

The case is separate from another patent fight between the companies in which Gilead was originally ordered to pay $200 million for infringement. A court later found attorney misconduct by Merck’s legal team and threw out the verdict. Merck tried taking the case to the Supreme Court, but the high court declined taking up the case in 2019. 

Source link

Latest Articles

Widely used chemical linked to 1,00,000 US deaths per year: Study

NEW YORK: Daily exposure to phthalates, a group of chemicals used in everything from plastic containers to makeup, may lead to approximately 100,000 deaths...

Foods to Reduce Inflammation and Strengthen the Immune System

Did you know that you can greatly reduce inflammation and boost your immune system by simply incorporating more anti-inflammatory foods and beverages into your...

Personal Selling

INTRODUCTION Early sellers and traders were not held in high esteem. The Roman word for salesman meant ‘Cheater’ and...

Building Muscle on a Vegan Diet

There are a lot of  misconceptions surrounding veganism. The notion that those who practice it are lacking in protein and therefore muscles is the...

Electrodes in brain new hope for severe cases of epilepsy

Neurosurgeons at All India Institute of Medical Sciences have devised a new technique for operating on children suffering from a severe form of epilepsy...